![buy contax g2 buy contax g2](https://i.ebayimg.com/images/g/L6AAAOSwdz9d6brS/s-l300.jpg)
But I have to say the G2 is hands down the best small camera system I've used - my first choice for travel. sometimes too good for close up's of faces. You've really got to consider that the G2 is a different animal from the Nikon. If you want to shoot fast and move around lot the G2 is a super camera and the slides I get from it are the best of any camera system I've tried. although, in medium format, I'm much more slow and methodical. The Nikon F100/F5 are fantastic camera and for everything you might want to shoot, but it is not as compact as the G2 for street photography - what do I know, I sometime carry an RB67 or Bronica ETRSi for the same things in the city. The Nikon F100 is my second choice for an autofocus camera fits a photographer's hand like a glove and with the right lens, every bit as useful as the G2, and in some shots it will be more efficient than the G2.
![buy contax g2 buy contax g2](https://live.staticflickr.com/5029/5603346917_2b3c7dba81_b.jpg)
For travel, vacation, city-grab shots it a fantastic little machine. It was never designed to replace an SLR, but I've used mine on a model shoot with great results. The G2 is a marvelous camera system I love the quality of the lenses. My F80 is almost too versatile, while being a little too large to comfortably carry around with me. In some ways, I like having some limitations to work around. It's always a tough decision when buying a camera, isn't it? As I said before, I love the look of Zeiss lenses, and I've checked out galeries extensively. On the other hand, I might miss having the spotmeter I now have in my Nikon F80. So, I guess if I got the Contax, it would be like having a more advanced, much better-built version of that Kodak. I was never bothered by not having a visual focus confirmation, and I rarely got any out of focus pictures.
![buy contax g2 buy contax g2](https://www.35mmc.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/nicographicc-20160811-2.jpg)
From what I understand of the G2, the focus system in that Kodak is similar, in that you put whatever you want to focus on inside the little focus area brackets in the centre, lock focus with the shutter button, and then recompose if necessary. During most of the 1990's, instead of my SLR, I used a Kodak compact 35mm, without zoom, but with autofocus and a rangefinder-like viewfinder. I would be just as interested in a Leica M if I could afford one, but I would be hesitant to buy anything that doesn't have autofocus, at this point. I've grown to like the limitations imposed by having to "zoom" with my feet.
#Buy contax g2 manual#
In the past, I've used a series of all manual Pentax camera, almost exclusively with a 50mm lens. I do like to have have the ability of setting exposure manually, while sometimes using aperture priority. I prefer the normal view of a 45 or 50mm lens, but I want to be able to do portraits (so 90 mm would be enough), and use a 28mm for tight spaces. But I don't like to be conspicuous when I'm photographing (an F80 with a 28-105 zoom on it isn't exactly inconspicuous, in fact, it attracts a lot of attention, I've found), and I don't really need a wide range of lenses. I love travel photography but I'm now limited in my ability to travel, so I'm photographing my own city. My interests are mainly city photography and scenic shots (both B&W and colour) - I wouldn't call it street photography exactly, as I'm not interested in the people that much, just photos of interesting city scenes, old buildings, old signs,etc. I'm basically a snapshooter who just likes his pictures to have a pleasing composition and good technical qualities (sharp, good exposure).